If your addresses were disqualified for farming because you are alledged to owned many for farming purpose and in your efforts in defending the judgement meted out on you, you created 4 account, 1 main & 3 back ups to upvote you post(s)
The reason the team should stress themselves looking into your issue should be a priority for you at the moment. I hope you will put up a very good defense as I will like to follow up on your issue on GitHub
I dont understand? 4 accounts? Upvotes?
I had one account and today I tried setting up and running multisig tasks. I have no idea what you mean.
I have no idea who these are ?? — All 3 (@lailelaodi, @gongzihu5 and @970839422)
Thanks, I re-read through it again and made more sense of it…
Basically - I assumed he was taling about something else when I had no Idea what he actually meant.
As I said, I didn’t even know what he meant by upvoting and assumed Id done it by mistake…
All I know is I was on spreadsheet a couple of months ago and now I’m not and I dont have tem accounts.
I was planning to set up some hardware and checked today and couldn’t find address.
Question 1: Since it is a multi-signature wallet, it must be signed and guarded by multiple wallets together
Question 2: In the witch condition, it is normal to sign multiple wallets in >= 10 addresses. Considering the airdrop share, a plan can be made. Only 2 addresses are airdropped in 10 addresses. Peacefully resolve the witch war
I’m very confused, would rather 28 bounty hunters hunt thousands of multi-signature users why not consider intercepting only those witch addresses that create 100+ or 500 5000
A large number of retail addresses are reported maliciously, mainly 2, 3 and 4 in cities
Air drop hunters with malicious reports
Request to recheck the reporting list
Re verify the rewards for the whistleblower, and suggest that the lock in whistleblower receive a 10-year reward.
For whistleblowers who report maliciously, their rewards for reporting will be canceled directly