[SEP #2] Community Initiative To Unpause Token Contract (Enabling Transferability)

[theobtl]

Do you mean how long SEP-1 remained in a review period after its last change?

That was six days.

See also here:

[SEP #1] SafeDAO Participation Agreement

Now that the proposal has been updated based on everyone’s feedback. I suggest to leave it open for a final review for another six days from the update, i.e. until Oct 17. @Bruce I agree with you that the proposal seems ready for a Snapshot vote already today. However, our current governance process requires a proposal to be open for review for at least six days. We have yet to define more granularly whether the waiting period also applies to changed proposals, and if so whether exceptions will…

And here:

[HOW TO] SafeDAO Governance Process

Our very first proposal SEP #1 brought up the question whether the review period of proposals should be extended in case of edits. In case of minor changes, that should most certainly not be required. I suggest to make the following change to the process in the first post: Current Edit: Suggested change v2 Please vote below for a temperature check and comment if you have other suggestions. poll Note: I do not anticipate an extensive discussion around this change, but if you do, let’s move …